Vue源码学习 nextTick
November 23, 2018 • ☕️ 5 min read
vue在视图更新的时候是异步更新,这个很多人已经知道了,这么做的好处有很多,今天我们就来看看vue是如何调度这个异步更新队列去优化性能的。
src/core/util/next-tick.js
/* @flow */
/* globals MessageChannel */
import { noop } from 'shared/util'
import { handleError } from './error'
import { isIOS, isNative } from './env'
const callbacks = []
let pending = false
function flushCallbacks () {
pending = false
const copies = callbacks.slice(0)
callbacks.length = 0
for (let i = 0; i < copies.length; i++) {
copies[i]()
}
}
// Here we have async deferring wrappers using both microtasks and (macro) tasks.
// In < 2.4 we used microtasks everywhere, but there are some scenarios where
// microtasks have too high a priority and fire in between supposedly
// sequential events (e.g. #4521, #6690) or even between bubbling of the same
// event (#6566). However, using (macro) tasks everywhere also has subtle problems
// when state is changed right before repaint (e.g. #6813, out-in transitions).
// Here we use microtask by default, but expose a way to force (macro) task when
// needed (e.g. in event handlers attached by v-on).
let microTimerFunc
let macroTimerFunc
let useMacroTask = false
// Determine (macro) task defer implementation.
// Technically setImmediate should be the ideal choice, but it's only available
// in IE. The only polyfill that consistently queues the callback after all DOM
// events triggered in the same loop is by using MessageChannel.
/* istanbul ignore if */
if (typeof setImmediate !== 'undefined' && isNative(setImmediate)) {
macroTimerFunc = () => {
setImmediate(flushCallbacks)
}
} else if (typeof MessageChannel !== 'undefined' && (
isNative(MessageChannel) ||
// PhantomJS
MessageChannel.toString() === '[object MessageChannelConstructor]'
)) {
const channel = new MessageChannel()
const port = channel.port2
channel.port1.onmessage = flushCallbacks
macroTimerFunc = () => {
port.postMessage(1)
}
} else {
/* istanbul ignore next */
macroTimerFunc = () => {
setTimeout(flushCallbacks, 0)
}
}
// Determine microtask defer implementation.
/* istanbul ignore next, $flow-disable-line */
if (typeof Promise !== 'undefined' && isNative(Promise)) {
const p = Promise.resolve()
microTimerFunc = () => {
p.then(flushCallbacks)
// in problematic UIWebViews, Promise.then doesn't completely break, but
// it can get stuck in a weird state where callbacks are pushed into the
// microtask queue but the queue isn't being flushed, until the browser
// needs to do some other work, e.g. handle a timer. Therefore we can
// "force" the microtask queue to be flushed by adding an empty timer.
if (isIOS) setTimeout(noop)
}
} else {
// fallback to macro
microTimerFunc = macroTimerFunc
}
/**
* Wrap a function so that if any code inside triggers state change,
* the changes are queued using a (macro) task instead of a microtask.
*/
export function withMacroTask (fn: Function): Function {
return fn._withTask || (fn._withTask = function () {
useMacroTask = true
const res = fn.apply(null, arguments)
useMacroTask = false
return res
})
}
export function nextTick (cb?: Function, ctx?: Object) {
let _resolve
callbacks.push(() => {
if (cb) {
try {
cb.call(ctx)
} catch (e) {
handleError(e, ctx, 'nextTick')
}
} else if (_resolve) {
_resolve(ctx)
}
})
if (!pending) {
pending = true
if (useMacroTask) {
macroTimerFunc()
} else {
microTimerFunc()
}
}
// $flow-disable-line
if (!cb && typeof Promise !== 'undefined') {
return new Promise(resolve => {
_resolve = resolve
})
}
}
首先这个文件的开头定义了两个全局变量
const callbacks = []
let pending = false
callbacks用来存放我们需要异步执行的函数队列, pending用来标记是否已经命令callbacks在下个tick全部执行,防止多次调用。
入口
export function nextTick (cb?: Function, ctx?: Object) {
let _resolve
callbacks.push(() => {
if (cb) {
try {
cb.call(ctx)
} catch (e) {
handleError(e, ctx, 'nextTick')
}
} else if (_resolve) {
_resolve(ctx)
}
})
if (!pending) {
pending = true
if (useMacroTask) {
macroTimerFunc()
} else {
microTimerFunc()
}
}
// $flow-disable-line
if (!cb && typeof Promise !== 'undefined') {
return new Promise(resolve => {
_resolve = resolve
})
}
}
我们在外部调用都是nextTick(() => { // doSth }) 这样子去使用, 把一个cb函数传入nextTick函数中, nextTick函数首先
callbacks.push(() => {
if (cb) {
try {
cb.call(ctx)
} catch (e) {
handleError(e, ctx, 'nextTick')
}
} else if (_resolve) {
_resolve(ctx)
}
})
把我们的cb函数包装了一层,做了判断,这是为了nextTick可以用then方法,我们就暂且当做直接把cb函数push进callbacks队列吧。
我们需要知道的是microTask是在同步方法完成的末尾去执行, macroTask则是直接是到下一个task了,task之间又可能会包含浏览器的重渲染,setTimeout默认的4ms延迟等等…从性能和时效性来看都是microTask更为优先。
关于macroTask和microTask的区别不是本文的重点,如果有需要的小伙伴可以去查阅一下浏览器的eventLoop相关的知识点。
随后如果pending的标志位还没有置为true,就把pending置为true, 并且开始根据useMacroTask这个标志判断 nextTick是通过macroTask实现还是microTask实现, 并且去调用这个task,这样在下一个tick就会去把callbacks里的方法全部执行。
if (!pending) {
pending = true
if (useMacroTask) {
macroTimerFunc()
} else {
microTimerFunc()
}
}
判断macroTask和microTask该用什么api
回到这个文件的上半部分
let microTimerFunc
let macroTimerFunc
let useMacroTask = false
首先定义了3个全局变量, 可以看到useMacroTask默认为false,接下来就要开始根据浏览器的api兼容性判断,用什么来实现microTimerFunc和macroTimerFunc
接下来vue开始判断如何实现macroTimerFunc
if (typeof setImmediate !== 'undefined' && isNative(setImmediate)) {
macroTimerFunc = () => {
setImmediate(flushCallbacks)
}
} else if (typeof MessageChannel !== 'undefined' && (
isNative(MessageChannel) ||
// PhantomJS
MessageChannel.toString() === '[object MessageChannelConstructor]'
)) {
const channel = new MessageChannel()
const port = channel.port2
channel.port1.onmessage = flushCallbacks
macroTimerFunc = () => {
port.postMessage(1)
}
} else {
/* istanbul ignore next */
macroTimerFunc = () => {
setTimeout(flushCallbacks, 0)
}
}
这段方法就是判断macroTask优先去使用setImmediate, 其次是MessageChannel,最次是setTimeout。
接下来去判断microTask
if (typeof Promise !== 'undefined' && isNative(Promise)) {
const p = Promise.resolve()
microTimerFunc = () => {
p.then(flushCallbacks)
if (isIOS) setTimeout(noop)
}
} else {
microTimerFunc = macroTimerFunc
}
microTask只有Promise一个选项,如果浏览器没有提供promise的api 就只能降级为上面判断的macroTimerFunc了。
在下个tick执行异步队列
无论是microTask还是macroTask 传入的方法都是flushCallbacks,那这个肯定就是执行callbacks的方法了,我们来看看这个方法的定义
function flushCallbacks () {
pending = false
const copies = callbacks.slice(0)
callbacks.length = 0
for (let i = 0; i < copies.length; i++) {
copies[i]()
}
}
这个方法很简短, 把pendding置为false,把callbacks拷贝一份并且把callbacks清空 这是为了在nextTick的方法里再次调用nextTick,能够新开一个异步队列, 然后循环这个拷贝callbacks里的函数, 一次性执行完毕,
vue的异步队列调度就是这样实现的, 希望在大家在工作中也能运用这种思想, 把影响性能而且能合并的方法异步合并执行。